These include papers published in refereed journals, book chapters, conference papers, and preprints intended for publication.
The academic publishing dinosaurs are still clinging to an obsolete model of dissemination, grabbing copyright of scientific work and charging extortionate fees for access to it. If you are having difficulties obtaining a final published version of any manuscript (e.g. to cite the correct page numbers for quotes) then email me for suggestions.
Papers in red are submitted manuscripts that are subject to change. They should not be cited without checking with me first. Papers in blue are accepted manuscripts that are ready for publication. There may be minor proofing corrections, and full citation information (volume number, page numbers) will be added as soon as known. Papers in black have been finalised and are not subject to change.
Roberts, M.J. (2017). Digitising schematic maps: Recreating or reinventing history? Second International Workshop on Exploring Old Maps (EOM 2017), Universität Würzburg, April.
Workshop paper. A short discussion of the potential benefits and pitfalls that arise when investigating historic schematic maps by recreating them using vector graphics software.
Roberts, M.J., Gray, H., & Lesnik, J. (2017). Preference versus performance: Investigating the dissociation between objective measures and subjective ratings of usability for schematic metro maps and intuitive theories of design. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 98,
Preprint of refereed journal paper. My large-scale internet survey of opinions on usability and design is now published, along with related experiments looking at Paris Metro and Berlin U-Bahn maps. The findings on intuitive theories of design are particularly interesting.
Roberts, M.J. (2017). From reasoning and intelligence research to information design: Understanding and optimising the usability and acceptability of schematic transit maps. In N.D. Galbraith, E. Lucas & D. Over (eds.), The thinking mind: A festschrift for Ken Manktelow (pp. 178-190). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Preprint of book chapter. A review of psychological findings on reasoning and intelligence that are relevant to theories of effective schematic map design.
Roberts, M.J., Newton, E.J., & Canals, M. (2016). Radi(c)al departures: Comparing conventional octolinear versus concentric circles schematic maps for the Berlin U-Bahn/S-Bahn networks using objective and subjective measures of effectiveness. Information Design Journal, 22, 92-115.
Preprint of refereed journal paper. The first usability test conducted on a concentric circles map. In terms of journey planning, this design performed poorly, but this study also develops the journey planning methodology further, and provides some important insights into the relationship between subjective opinions on usability, and objective measurements of this.
Roberts, M.J., & Rose, D. (2016). Map-induced journey-planning biases for a simple network:
A Docklands Light Railway study. Transportation Research A, 94, 446-460.
Preprint of refereed journal paper. A large-scale usability study of several Docklands Light Railway prototype train maps. This used a touch-screen methodology and there were several important findings concerning usability ratings, task accuracy, and journey choices influenced by map configuration.
Roberts, M.J., & Vaeng, I.C.N. (2016). Expectations and prejudices usurp judgements of schematic map effectiveness. In: P. Lloyd & E. Bohemia (eds.), Proceedings of DRS2016: Design + Research + Society — Future-Focused Thinking, Volume 8, pp 2343-2359, DOI 10.21606/drs.2016.123.
Refereed conference paper. This paper reports research comparing the usability of two maps
from a large-scale internet rating study. Of these, the map with the worse ratings yielded
the better planning performance!
Roberts, M.J., Newton, E.J., Gray, H., Lesnik, J., & Canals, M. (2015). Preference is not performance: Objective versus subjective measures of Berlin schematic map usability.
IIID Vision Plus 2015, Birmingham, September.
Conference poster. This gives an overview of findings from two different studies looking at the usability of Berlin maps. The theme of the conference was information + design = performance
and so this poster was very appropriate.
Roberts, M.J. (2014). What’s your theory of effective schematic map design? Schematic Mapping Workshop 2014, University of Essex, April.
Workshop position paper. A discussion of the importance of lay-theories of design in determining people’s evaluation and creation of schematic maps. This also includes a preliminary analysis of my internet survey of usability and aesthetic ratings of nine alternative London Underground maps, and an overview of various prescriptions, theories, and frameworks for effective design.
Roberts, M.J. (2014). Schematic maps in the laboratory. Schematic Mapping Workshop 2014, University of Essex, April.
Workshop position paper. A review of empirical work that investigated schematic map usability, and some of the difficulties that must be overcome in conducting such research.
Roberts, M.J., Newton, E.J., Lagattolla, F.D., Hughes, S., & Hasler, M.C. (2013). Objective versus subjective measures of Paris Metro map usability: Investigating traditional octolinear versus all-curves schematic maps. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 71, 363-386.
Preprint of refereed journal paper. The curvilinear map was 50% faster for journey planning than the official octolinear map. Objective and subjective measures of usability were not correlated. The octolinearity = gold standard conjecture is refuted by these findings.
Fink, M., Haverkort, H., Nöllenburg, M., Roberts, M.J., Schuhmann, J., & Wolff, A. (2013). Drawing metro maps using Bézier curves. In W. Didmo & M. Patrignani (eds.), Graph Drawing 2012, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7704, 463-474. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Refereed conference paper. A collaboration with researchers from The Netherlands and Germany looking at automated methods for creating curvilinear maps.